PeoplePerHour

Tap a star to rate

PeoplePerHour is a British online freelance marketplace founded in 2007 by Xenios Thrasyvoulou and Simos Kitiris, two engineering graduates from Cambridge University. The company is headquartered in London with an additional office in Athens, Greece. This European origin distinguishes it from the American-founded Upwork and Fiverr, and it carries implications for user demographics and payment infrastructure. PeoplePerHour received Series A funding of two million pounds from Index Ventures in 2012 and was named one of Europe's one hundred hottest startups that year by Wired UK. The platform operates globally but has retained a strong European and particularly UK presence, with approximately sixty percent of its users based in the United Kingdom. However, the platform now serves over 100 countries and lists about three million rated freelancers who have collectively earned over 150 million pounds on the platform.

PeoplePerHour operates as a hybrid marketplace combining elements of both Upwork's bidding model and Fiverr's packaged service approach. Clients can browse vetted freelancers and post project briefs, or they can purchase "offers," which are pre-designed service packages offered by freelancers at fixed prices. This dual model allows freelancers to work either reactively (responding to client briefs) or proactively (selling pre-packaged services). The platform introduced "Hourlies," its equivalent of Fiverr's gigs, in July 2012. Hourlies are fixed-price service packages that allow freelancers to move beyond hourly billing and offer defined deliverables. The "Hourly" name is somewhat confusing because these are not hourly contracts but rather hourly-rate-equivalent services priced for a specific outcome.

The service categories on PeoplePerHour span over 8,766 different skills across ten major categories: technology and programming, design, writing and translation, digital marketing, video and image editing, social media management, business services, music and audio, marketing and sales, and AI services. The platform's breadth of categories is comparable to Upwork, and the emphasis on technology is similarly strong. For designers, writers, marketers, and developers, PeoplePerHour has reasonable depth. Unlike some smaller competitors, the platform has achieved sufficient critical mass in multiple skill areas to be viable as a primary income source, not just a supplementary channel.

One notable feature of PeoplePerHour is its emphasis on hand-reviewed talent. The platform claims that every freelancer is hand-reviewed and approved before their profile goes live. This suggests a higher barrier to entry than some competitors, which claim automatic account creation. A more restrictive approval process could theoretically mean higher average quality, though it also means slower onboarding and the possibility of rejection. For clients, hand-reviewed freelancers may offer more assurance of legitimacy. For freelancers, the approval requirement is a friction point during signup.

PeoplePerHour has also invested in artificial intelligence and algorithmic matching. The platform offers "Phoenix AI," which recommends freelancers to clients based on a project brief. The AI-driven recommendation approach represents a trend across all major marketplaces to reduce friction in discovery and matching. Rather than requiring clients to post jobs and wait for bids, or requiring clients to search and filter freelancers manually, AI matching can rapidly surface a relevant set of potential vendors. For freelancers, this means visibility can come from algorithmic relevance, not just active bidding or client search. For clients, it means faster discovery and potentially better matching.

The time-to-completion metric PeoplePerHour advertises is instructive: the platform states that "it takes about ten minutes to task a freelancer, with ninety percent of projects completed in seven days." This suggests a platform optimized for quick turnaround work rather than complex, long-duration projects. If you are selling work that can be scoped, delivered, and completed in days, PeoplePerHour's speed and simplicity are advantages. If you do ongoing consulting or multiphase projects, the platform's emphasis on quick completion may feel misaligned.

PeoplePerHour's fee structure is tiered by lifetime billing, which means the more you earn on the platform, the lower your commission percentage. The breakdown is as follows: below £250 (approximately $350 USD) in lifetime billing per buyer, freelancers pay a twenty percent service fee. Between £250 and £5,000 lifetime billing per buyer, the fee drops to seven point five percent. Above £5,000 lifetime billing per buyer, the fee falls to three point five percent. All fees are listed as excluding value-added tax (VAT), a British tax that varies by country and account type. This tiered structure rewards loyalty and volume: a freelancer who builds strong long-term relationships and earns significant revenue has their commission halved or better. However, new freelancers pay the full twenty percent, which is substantial and similar to Fiverr's rate. A new freelancer earning £250 on PeoplePerHour pays £50 in commissions; the same freelancer earning £250 on Upwork would pay zero to fifteen percent depending on contract factors.

The payment methods on PeoplePerHour include bank transfer, PayPal, and a few additional options depending on your country and account type. The platform does not publish specific details about withdrawal minimums or processing times on its public site, so you would need to check during signup or contact support for exact terms. The platform uses escrow for fixed-price projects, holding client payment until the freelancer delivers and the client approves.

PeoplePerHour's strengths include the tiered fee structure, which rewards consistent freelancers, the emphasis on hand-reviewed quality, and a reasonable diversity of job types. The platform has also been stable and active for over fifteen years, suggesting operational durability. The European base and UK-heavy user base can be an advantage if you are selling to UK businesses or European clients, who may find cultural and geographic alignment appealing. Many UK small businesses use PeoplePerHour as a first choice for freelancing, giving it an advantage in that specific market.

The limitations are notable. First, the platform is significantly smaller than Upwork or Fiverr, which means fewer posted jobs and less client traffic for most skill categories. Second, the initial twenty percent fee for new freelancers is among the highest in the market. You must build a reputation and accumulate earnings to benefit from the tiered discounts. Third, the platform's marketing and brand recognition outside the UK is limited. Many freelancers and clients globally have not heard of PeoplePerHour, which means you cannot rely on organic traffic in the same way you might on Upwork.

PeoplePerHour works best if you are based in or have a focus on the UK market, if you can tolerate the initial high fee while you build reputation, or if you have relationships and can drive clients directly to the platform. It is also worth considering if you want to offer hybrid services across both project bids and fixed-price packages, as the platform's combination of both models is more integrated than some competitors. For an international freelancer competing globally, PeoplePerHour is typically a supplementary platform rather than a primary one. For a UK-based freelancer with local clients, it can be a valuable primary channel. The tiered fee structure also makes it attractive for long-term relationships: if you land several retainer or ongoing clients, the commission reduction can become significant and worthwhile.

More in Freelance Marketplaces

See all